This segment of the Boston Strangler tells the story of 13 women who were murdered in and around Boston in the early 1960s, sometimes referred to as the “Silk Stocking Murders,” from the perspective of the two journalists who broke the story on the connected killings, Loretta McLaughlin and Jean Cole.
Over the course of the nearly two years that the 13 victims, ranging in age from 19 to 85 years old, were killed, McLaughlin and Cole led the charge on the theory that the grisly murders were the work of a single assailant, whom they dubbed the “Boston Strangler.” This was nearly a decade before the term “serial killer” was coined.
The first six murders, all of older single women who had seemingly willingly allowed the killer to enter their homes, took place in the summer of 1962. There was then a months-long lull in the killing spree until 20-year-old Sophie Clark was found strangled to death in her apartment that December. The next six victims, murdered between December 1962 and January 1964, varied in age from 19 to 69 years old. The majority were sexually assaulted before being strangled to death.
McLaughlin and Cole began publishing a series of investigative reports on the killings in January 1963, with the first story bearing the newspaper’s questionably chosen headline of “ Two Girl Reporters Analyze Strangler.” This launched a month-long run of nearly 30 articles about the murders, according to Smithsonian Magazine. It was at this point in time that McLaughlin and Cole started to come up against significant resistance from authorities who took the stance that the level of detail included in their reporting wasn’t helping the investigation and could inspire copycat crimes.
In October 1964, 34-year-old Albert DeSalvo was arrested for sexually assaulting a woman after pretending to be a police officer to gain entry into her home. When his photo was published in the papers, several other women came forward to say that he had committed similar assaults against them, a set of attacks that came to be known as the “Green Man” crimes.
DeSalvo was sent to await trial at Bridgewater State Hospital, a state facility for the criminally insane, and it was there that he allegedly confessed to his cellmate, George Nassar, that he was responsible for the murders associated with the Boston Strangler case. Nassar relayed the confession to his lawyer, famed defense attorney F. Lee Bailey, who took on DeSalvo as a client when he became the prime suspect in the case.
Even with DeSalvo’s own confession, there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute him for the Boston Strangler murders. In 1967, he was tried on charges related to the “Green Man” crimes and sentenced to life in prison for armed robbery and sexual assault. DeSalvo recanted his confession in prison in 1973 shortly before he was stabbed to death by a fellow inmate.
Some have suggested that Nassar, who is serving a life sentence for a separate murder conviction, is a more likely suspect than DeSalvo and coached him to confess with promises that his family would be taken care of financially. In an interview with Nassar, he denied having taken part in the killings and claimed he told Bailey to take on DeSalvo’s case. “We were setting it all up, saying Al you’re going to confess, you’re going to trial, you’re going to do your book, we’re going to take care of your family and he was saying ok, ok, ok,” he said.
Boston Strangler posits that another likely suspect was Daniel Marsh, a pseudonym for an ex-Harvard Student who was also one of DeSalvo’s fellow inmates at Bridgewater and had once dated one of the victims. In the following years, Marsh moved to Ann Arbor, Mich., where a series of similar murders later took place.
Forty years after DeSalvo’s death, a 2013 DNA analysis ultimately linked him to the murder of Mary Sullivan, the last and youngest of the victims associated with the Boston Strangler case. The question of whether DeSalvo committed the other 12 murders remains unanswered.
At the time of the positive DNA identification in 2013, the New York Times quoted Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley as saying that DeSalvo’s confession had “been the subject of skepticism and controversy from almost the moment it was given.”
